The two offices of the hong kong version of the national security law (edited by: the hong kong and macau affairs office of the state council and the liaison office of the central people’s government in hong kong) spoke out to “appease” the general public’s right to assembly will continue to be guaranteed.  , do you believe it? Looking at the first june 4th rally 30 years ago, in fact, day one of the two offices has labelled the june 4th rally as "Anti-chinese activities", calling out slogans (down with li peng), peaceful rally, stepping on bicycles the xinhua news agency, which was the predecessor of the hong kong and macau affairs office and the liaison office of the central people's republic of china, issued statements criticizing the british side for condoning the stake, making hong kong a "Subversive state". Subversive base.
According to a british declassified file  in 1990 , both ghost mannequin effect service offices directly complained to the british side, accusing the stake of attacking chinese leaders during the june 4th event, believing that this was already a "Public humiliation", zhong wenying said. Fang dianjie did not use the public security ordinance to declare the activities of the stake on june 3rd and 4th illegal, and even asked hong kong british to stop all stake activities.
In response, the british side will follow up on the above-mentioned activities in accordance with hong kong law, but the two offices continue to investigate the british side for "Prevaricate", criticizing hong kong and britain for having laws and not "Pretending". The british foreign office has seen this. , there is a sudden (exclamation mark "!") in the file, so I don't think the chinese side will understand it.